On Non-Monogamy: Do Open Relationships Work?

Non-monogamy is about one thing—sex. And sex is good. And sex with different people—either concurrently or over the course of a lifetime—is good too. Sex is so good that some people are addicted to it. (Have you ever heard of someone being addicted to something that isn’t good for you? Addiction = bad.) Sex makes people do crazy things and it makes people feel amazing things. I love it just as much as anyone else, but there is more to life than sex.

I am pretty sure that the words on your deathbed won’t be “I wish I had had more sex with more people.” Maybe if you are a pervert, or if you didn’t get much action in your life, you would say that, but most people wouldn’t. Most people would say that they would have spent more time with their families, or that they wished they had worked less. They want more time with their wives, or they regret not pursuing a dream. Unless someone is being a smartass on his deathbed, he’s not going to even think about sex when his number’s up.

I live in San Francisco. Non-monogamy (or polyamory as it is called here) is a big topic in the city. It’s not just the gays talking about it; straight folks are into open relationships too. Polyamory is not just a straight, gay, queer, bi, or trans issue. Out here, everybody’s doing it. And if everyone is doing it here, then it’s probably already in or coming to a town near you.

Here’s the definition of monogamy:

NOUN:

1 archaic : the practice of marrying only once during a lifetime 2 : the state or custom of being married to one person at a time 3 : the condition or practice of having a single mate during a period of time

Notice anything? Right off the bat, Webster’s is linking monogamy to marriage, and they should, because monogamy comes from monos (alone, single) + gamos (marriage). Monogamy used to be about being with one person forever, and now it’s been updated to mean the state or “custom” of being married to one person at a time. The logical opposite of monogamy is polygamy, being married to more than one person at a time, and not very many people (publicly) support that.

So, then, what threatens monogamy? Certainly divorce, but what causes divorce? Lots of things, but the thing that I am concerned with most is—you guessed it—sex. More than anything else, sex with other people seems to violate the contract of marriage, and, in turn, monogamy. Sure, people still associate monogamy with marriage, but most people nowadays associate monogamy (or open relationships) with sex. And the majority of people also throw in love. If you love someone, you don’t have sex with someone else. If you are married, you don’t have sex with someone else. If you are monogamous, you don’t have sex with someone else. So, bottom line—love, sex, and marriage are all implicated in monogamy.

Look, I'm old-fashioned; I'm okay with it and not hiding it at all. I want the lifetime partner, “the one,” the soul mate. I want the house. I want the dogs. I want the kids. If I had a white picket fence…well as long as it doesn’t enclose a yard in the suburbs, I would smile every time I looked out my window.

But I am not an idiot. I am not waiting for the knight in shining armor to save me so we can ride off into the sunset and live happily ever after. I know marriage takes work. It takes mind numbing, backbreaking work. Marriage is only a few words. It’s a promise that you won’t go anywhere, and you can’t. No matter what happens, you have to stick around. Well, that’s what it means to me.

25 readers liked this story.
From Around the Web:
07.30.2011
June Just
THIS PRETTY WELL SUMS UP THE WORLD AS WE LIVE IN IT NOW. At least it sums it up for many of us. Divorced and straight, older and unwilling to marry again, many find ourselves unable to really fit in. I have tried for over two years, breaking up once and friends for awhile, with a man who refuses to have less than three women in his life at a time. After all, he is 76 years and not many years left and I at 71 may also be in this situation. I worked hard to accept this situation but he was unable to just not talk to me about the others, to allow us to just enjoy as much as possible what we had. I was committed to him since I do not believe in more than one relationship at a time. In time I have found myself angry...at him, but more so at myself for allowing me to accept what I am not comfortable living with. So again we are broken up. I have no idea if a friendship will survive or not and at the moment that is not my primary thoughts. I feel better. That counts.
09.02.2010
K Sheffield
Ms. Polly: I happened to be linked to this... statement of opinion, through a website I choose to frequent, and I am...dismayed by this story. It seems less a defense or even condoning of monogamy, and more an opportunity for you to air your opinions about polyamory, which is NOT only or all about sex. I am distressed that you did not seem to be willing to offer A) that your opinion is an opinion, and shouldn't be taken as a matter of undisputed fact, or B) that you are not presenting an unbiased viewpoint to those who will read your story, and that they should remain free and open to making up their own minds. But as I have mentioned, it is your opinion, and you are entitled to it. I merely wished to express to you that I am not in agreement with it.
01.18.2010
Robert Erikson
Integrity - I am on the site because (1) the creators of the site then and now advertise it as follows: "What about men? ...while we won't make a bid fuss about them, men are welcome to visit and even contribute...", and (2) sex is more interesting than politics or religion, and the topic of monotony (aka monogamy) is intriguing within sex. I just find it bemusing that an intelligent person would defend monogamy any more in light of modern birth control and the certainty paternal DNA testing, but an actual affront and real threat when they defend archaic laws that support it at the expense of the freedom of those who do not. Imagine an America where you could privately practice more than one religion if you wanted to, but the law would punish you if it ever elevated to the official attention of public power? Anyway, what's your take on the issue? Do you believe law should prohibit marriage contracts that agree to non-manogamy without legal predudice?
01.16.2010
integrity
Robert, what are you doing on a site meant for women to be able to express themselves freely?
01.14.2010
Dawn
Polly - you post a question but instead of bothering to find out the answer, you give a bigoted nonsense that just shows you level of ignorance. If you want to be a writer - write about what you actually know. If you pose a question, maybe you should ask the people who know the answer instead of making it up. There are a lot of people in successful, loving marriages that are non-monogamous. You have the right to judge our lives? Come back and tell me your opinion on relationships when you have been married for 23 years. 23 years, all of them non-monogamous, 16 with our third partner, and we are still in love. Works for us. You have no right to judge what works when you know nothing about it.
It feels good to write.

Your stories, musings, and advice are welcome here. We know you've got something to share, so jump in!

Article_sweeps
Most Liked Stories
Loader_buff
Sweeps_offers_article_300_top
Win a $10,000 escape to Jamaica! Enter as often as you wish.
Win a $10,000 escape to Jamaica! Enter as often as you wish.
VIEW ALL