Is BMI a Lie?

In a country crazy about fitness and health, we’ve all become obsessed with numbers. Women, especially, worry about the number of our jeans size, weight, waist size, cholesterol level, and dress size, just to name a few. At least those numbers are finite—regardless of our exact weight, we know that it is what it is. But there’s one number that always makes people feel anxious and ashamed … the dreaded BMI. Although I try not to know exactly how much I weigh, I still get confronted with a BMI at the doctor’s office, and even when playing Wii Fit. Part of my distaste for it is the sneaking suspicion that it’s not entirely accurate at gauging fitness. Turns out, I may not be alone in my distrust. 

Weight / Height = Fitness?
The Body Mass Index became part of our lives in the late 1990s, but it’s actually been around for over a hundred years. It was devised by a Belgian statistician named Adolphe Quetelet as a quantitative measure of fitness. The formula takes a person’s weight in pounds, divides it by her height in inches squared, then multiplies by 703. For a person who weighs 150 pounds and is sixty-six inches tall, that works out to a BMI of 24.2. It has long been used as a benchmark to roughly determine physical fitness, especially to qualify individuals for jobs as firefighters and policemen. It’s also long been used by insurance companies, researchers, and weight-loss groups. 

The National Institute of Health started using BMI to measure general physical fitness in 1998. According to the guidelines, a BMI of 20 to 25 is within the range of normal weight. Anything less than twenty is considered underweight, and 25 to 30 is considered overweight. BMIs of over 30 qualify a person as clinically obese. Although we would never consider a person who was 5'6" and 150 pounds to be overweight, a person of that height and weight has a BMI that teeters on the brink of being considered overweight. 

The BMI is useful as a rough estimate of proportionality since it’s a simple ratio of weight to height. The problem is that it’s not always accurate in measuring actual fitness, since it does not consider body composition, including the ratio of muscle to fat or bone density. People with high percentages of muscle mass—which is denser and weighs more—have higher BMIs, sometimes pushing them into the “overweight” category because the measurement doesn’t discriminate between muscle and fat.

7 readers liked this story.
email
Plus_14MORE WAYS TO SHARE
10.14.2009
MLRS-Mike
The problem of BMI for me as a career Soldier is according to the scale I am considered overweight. At 6 feet tall and weighting 205, my BMI was 27. However my body fat was always around 19 to 21 percent. My former life insurance company partly based my premium rates on my high BMI, which did not give me favorable monthly rates. There needs to be a better way of determining a persons body mass that takes account of differences in people.
It feels good to write.

Your stories, musings, and advice are welcome here. We know you've got something to share, so jump in!

Article_sweeps
most liked
Loader_buff
Sweeps_offers_article_300_top
How Do You Avoid Calorie Overload? Chime in and win $500!
How Do You Avoid Calorie Overload? Chime in and win $500!
Slimming down for a big event? Tell us about it and win $500!
Slimming down for a big event? Tell us about it and win $500!
VIEW ALL
Other topics you might appreciate