Just Enough: Why Some of Us Are Satisfied with Less

Dining out with me is an experience. Because when I go to a restaurant, I go with a game plan: to enjoy the most delicious meal it offers, hopefully at the lowest price. Once presented with a menu, I cannot engage in conversation until I make my choice, because I’m too distracted by the options in front of me. Some people are daunted by five- or six-page menus; I view them as a challenge. If I know ahead of time where I’ll be dining that evening, I look up the menu online for a head start and then ruminate on it all day. I ask servers for their opinions. I search for coupons. I calculate in my head whether the $15 chicken dish is really a better deal than the $20 seafood one, taking into account the fact that I make chicken at home all the time but I can’t easily re-create almond-encrusted halibut in my own kitchen. 

I ask and listen to what others are ordering so I can weigh my choice against theirs. On more than one occasion, I’ve tracked down a server to change my order. And if my meal doesn’t live up to the high, high standards I’ve set for it, I think of it not just as a misstep by the chef, but as a personal failure: I didn’t order correctly. I should’ve gotten the halibut. I can think of one person I might compare my restaurant behavior to: Sally from When Harry Met Sally. She tailored every order; she added things, held things, and got things on the side. Like I am, Sally was a restaurant maximizer. 

Maximizers and Satisficers
In the 1950s, a psychologist named Herbert Simon started taking a closer look at the way people make choices. The prevailing theory, espoused in economic models, was that people are rational decision makers. Like diners at a buffet, they examine all options before them, assess the costs and benefits of those options, and make a rational selection that maximizes value. Simon, however, thought this theory was flawed; it didn’t take into account the fact that—sorry to say, folks—human rationality is limited. It’s not possible to know everything about every option or to evaluate every possible outcome. 

19 readers liked this story.
email
Plus_14MORE WAYS TO SHARE
12.29.2010
Vanessa Brunner
I have to agree with Renae--I think most people are a little bit of both! It's pretty exhausting (and almost impossible) to live your life with just a single mindset--this definitely sounds like something you have to adjust, depending on the situation.
12.29.2010
Renae Hurlbutt
I am both maximizer and satisficer, depending on the circumstances. There are some instances when trying to maximize would be fruitless and exhausting. There are other cases where it would be silly to settle for less than the best.
I'll willingly admit to being a satisficer. I accept what I have and don't mope around for things I don't. If I constantly thought about the entrees I didn't order, the clothes I didn't buy, or the trips I didn't take, I'd be miserable.
12.29.2010
Rebecca Brown
Interesting that when I tell people about this concept, they almost always say they're a maximizer. No one wants to claim that he's the person who is satisfied with just enough. Perhaps it's the presentation of the concepts (in that being a maximizer somehow looks more desirable, even to satisficers), but I think each has its own merits and issues.
After reading this article, I believe I'm a maximizer in almost every sense of the word. No wonder I'm so tired!
It feels good to write.

Your stories, musings, and advice are welcome here. We know you've got something to share, so jump in!

Article_sweeps
most liked
Loader_buff
Sweeps_offers_article_300_top
How Do You Avoid Calorie Overload? Chime in and win $500!
How Do You Avoid Calorie Overload? Chime in and win $500!
Slimming down for a big event? Tell us about it and win $500!
Slimming down for a big event? Tell us about it and win $500!
VIEW ALL
Other topics you might appreciate
Relationships Style World