The Truth of Christmas: God on the Ground

Debunking myths about the Christmas story has become a holiday tradition. Little League Bible scholars like me write things that make the general public feel like a bunch of suckers for believing superfluous elements of the Christmas story. This exercise can be moderately enlightening, but it misses the point. Figuring out what isn’t true about the birth of Christ isn’t nearly as important as figuring out what is.

Nevertheless, like singing the national anthem at a baseball game, let’s run through the list of Christmas balderdash. The list is long, so let’s just hit the highlights and move on.

Jesus was not born on December 25th.
He was probably born in April, but nobody’s sure. After Christianity was Romanized, they decided to celebrate Christ’s birth at the winter solstice because pagan festivals were already held during that time. The thing I don’t get is why some people act like this makes the whole Christmas story a bunch of yuletide hooey. It was just good planning. Some third century Roman said, “Let’s seeeee … we need to find a time to celebrate the birth of Christ. We used to worship lichens and moss in December, but we don’t do that anymore, so that might work. And I wouldn’t have to by a new Day-Timer.”

Mary did not ride to Bethlehem on a donkey.
At least the Bible says nothing about a donkey, and I’m betting she was probably in a wagon. Think about it—a woman who’s nine months preggers bouncing up and down on a mule for sixty miles. She probably would have rode Joseph to Bethlehem before trying that.

The Immaculate Conception refers to the birth of Mary, not Jesus.
According to Roman Catholic doctrine, Mary was born without sin, making her pure enough to give birth to the Son of God. What I want to know is how she managed to say sin-free the first time that toddler Jesus chucked applesauce in her face.

The Bible doesn’t mention a stable.
It does mention a manger, which makes everyone think Jesus was born in a barn. It’s more likely that he was born in a cave or at the house of one of Joseph’s relatives.

The wise men didn’t make it to the manger, they weren’t kings, and we don’t know how many there were.
Tracking a star on a camel doesn’t make for quick work. The wise men probably showed up when Jesus was around two years old. They were “magi”—wise mystics—but not royalty. And since the Bible said they brought three gifts—gold, frankincense, and myrrh—a tradition arose that there were three of them. What the Bible doesn’t say is that Mary and Joseph spent three days trying to get frankincense and myrrh out of the carpet. Apparently, the wise men weren’t wise enough to know better than to give spice and perfume to a toddler.

That’s a sample of common Christmas myths. Now here’s what the Bible does tell us: that God chose to come to earth in the form of a vulnerable, impoverished baby. His mother wasn’t married when she became pregnant, and it was such a scandal that an angel had to give Joseph a verbal beat down so he wouldn’t dump her. The couple was so poor that they couldn’t find a place to stay, and Jesus’ first crib was a feeding trough.

“Manger” is just a cute word that hides the fact that the Son of God spent his first night in a place where sheep ate. Jesus was born poor, against the backdrop of impropriety.

He could have done it another way. He could have descended from heaven in a flaming chariot. He could have emerged from the ocean, bellowing with righteous rage as he struck down evildoers. Or he could have not come at all, leaving us to worship a distant God who has no idea what it’s like to be human.

21 readers liked this story.
From Around the Web:
12.27.2010
Ann Foster
The word is "ridden," not "rode". We absolutely need our myths, and we are doomed without them.
12.03.2010
John Byrne
@Jefferson Jesus not only existed, but many people died giving their lives because they believed he existed. Many of them spent time with Jesus and were tortured as they died because they would not renounce Jesus or his resurrection. Your statement "no one believed them then" is ridiculous and ignorant. Pronouncing broad platitudes does not make those things true. I realize I probably made some of you mad, but just repeating something you read somewhere without looking into the actual evidence isn't helpful. Overall, the article was good and brought out truth regarding the Christmas celebration. Evangelicals however do not believe Mary was sinless, but we do believe she was a virgin. Not sure what RC's believe.
12.03.2010
John Byrne
The ignorance by some of the comments made is simply astounding. @Labeeb Khayr there were much earlier lists of books in the Bible though not all of them the same see here: http://www.bible-researcher.com/canon1.html @John Sawyer The council of Nicea was to deal with the nature of Jesus, not put away certain other religions, but to put away unorthodox teaching about the nature of Jesus. See: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/sbrandt/nicea...
09.14.2010
Grace Marie
Jefferson, that is so sad. To be so arrogant to think we, you and me are just to find our true selves - whatever that means. What a sad and pointless life we would be living. Also, how do you know there was no Jesus? How do YOU really know? Come on now....just believing in things scholarly people tell you? These are just human inferences and opinions. I like to get my facts and wisdom from God in the bible because nothing a human can tell me is really knowledge or even close to true wisdom.
09.14.2010
Grace Marie
love this. so true.
It feels good to write.

Your stories, musings, and advice are welcome here. We know you've got something to share, so jump in!

Article_sweeps
Most Liked Stories
Loader_buff
Sweeps_offers_article_300_top
Win a $10,000 escape to Jamaica! Enter as often as you wish.
Win a $10,000 escape to Jamaica! Enter as often as you wish.
VIEW ALL