Eight Spelling Mistakes Even Smart People Make

English is a screwy language. There’s just no logic to it. Why is daughter pronounced daw-ter, but laughter not law-ter? How can though, through, and tough look so similar and yet sound so different? Why does I come before E except after C? What’s so effing SPECIAL about C?

This is the reason that people who speak more sensible languages approach English with stumbling trepidation. English is insane. It has the capacity to confuse even the smartest of its native speakers—including scientists, engineers, and company presidents—especially when it has to be put down on paper.

This I know from experience. As a copywriter, a large part of my job is to translate pages upon pages of “writing written by non-writers” into copy that is short, persuasive, easy-to-read, and yes—perfectly spelt and grammatically (or at least colloquially) correct.

Nobody knows the troubles I’ve seen.

For the most part, each person is unique in terms of writing disability (myself included). But there are some crimes of confusion—particularly when it comes to spelling—that I come across on an almost daily basis. And like overstaying guests, they’ve begun to grate on my nerves, becoming more and more unforgivable with each unwelcome appearance. Things like:

1. YOU’RE and YOUR
If you have no idea when to use which … Well, you’re not on your own. This is perhaps the most common mistake of all. Heaven knows why. The distinction is really quite simple:
  • You’re is used to substitute the words “you are.”
  • Your is a word you use when referring to something that belongs to the person you’re speaking to. “Your purse,” “your coat,” and so on—and not “Your late!” or “Your wrong!”
2. IT’S and ITS
Close cousins of you’re and your, it’s and its suffer about the same amount of misuse.
  • It’s (with an apostrophe) replaces “It is” or “It has.” (It’s easy to remember!)
  • Its (with no apostrophe) refers to something that belongs to “it.” (Its meaning is clear!)
3. THEY’RE, THEIR, and THERE
Ah, the triple treat … or terror, as the case may be.
  • They’re is short for “They are.”
  • Their refers to something that belongs to “them.”
  • And there is simply “not here.”
“They’re going to their house, which is over there.”

4. TO and TOO
When you mean “overly,” please remember to add the extra O—or face the consequences. I once received a heated text message that was meant to make me angry: “TO BAD!” it shouted in loud, aggressive capitals. I ended up in uncontrollable giggles instead. Too bad indeed.
19 readers liked this story.
share
POST
09.25.2009
Glenn Flowers
Michael, Electric, While you are both correct that language evolves, there are established criteria for including a word, previously unaccepted or illiterate, as acceptable. These standards have little to do with time and more to do with a need to accept such a word, its pending relativity in our vocabulary, historic usage, etc. There is, also, a well known and well worn path to acceptance; Illiterate, Vulgar, Slang, Regional, Nonstandard (not common), and Informal could all be waypoints for a word being accepted into a standard dictionary. Because a word appears in a dictionary does not confer acceptance. If a word is commonly in use but that usage is incorrect in every way, its entry in a dictionary may serve to inform as to the incorrectness of it. It would then be labeled as Illiterate or Nonstandard, both meaning WRONG. Try convincing an engineer or particle physicist that the English language changes just because of incidence. He will, more than likely, calll you an idiot.
09.23.2009
Allen Dobey
I think Mammy Yokum came up with "irregardless" about 50 or so years ago. That being the case, it should now be considered acceptable. On the other hand, I am surprised the author did not include "alright" in his list of invalid words. "All right" is correct.
09.22.2009
Playboymommy
Ok, the start of this article stated i before e, except after c....WELL how come in their, the e comes before i. WTF is up with that? Just sayin'
09.22.2009
flah
Apart from "irregardless," none of these are spelling mistakes at all. They're grammatical errors.
09.22.2009
tori
How about lightning? There is no E in lightning unless you're lightening your hair. Ugh.
It feels good to write.

Your stories, musings, and advice are welcome here. We know you've got something to share, so jump in—maybe get a little famous. And don't worry—you can save a draft!

most liked
Loader_buff
Other topics you might appreciate
Travel Home & Food Neighborhood & World