Earthquake Survival: Is Taking Cover the Safest Strategy?

The recent events in Haiti and Japan showed us that earthquakes are something we should all be prepared for—and are far from being just a “West Coast thing.” According to FEMA, thirty-nine states are at risk of a moderate to severe quake. Besides the usual suspects, like California, Oregon, and Washington, that list also includes Montana, Idaho, Illinois, Tennessee, Arkansas, Kentucky, and Missouri.

The survival strategy that the Red Cross, FEMA, and the United States Geological Survey endorse is the Drop, Cover, and Hold On method, where a person takes cover underneath the nearest large object and holds on until the shaking stops. But a competing viewpoint on earthquake survival—called the Triangle of Life—is making the rounds in people’s email inboxes and on the Internet. What’s the full story on this theory, and should it affect how you plan and prepare for disasters?

Finding the Right Angles
The Triangle of Life is a theory perpetuated by Doug Copp, an independent and for-profit rescue specialist. He claims that in his decades of search-and-rescue experience, he’s found that people who simply duck and cover get crushed to death, and that only by practicing his method can they survive a major earthquake. He explains that instead of seeking cover underneath large objects, people can stay alive by seeking out the triangle-shaped voids that exist next to them. Instead of getting under a desk, for example, Copp recommends crouching beside it, and rather than crawling underneath a bed, Copp urges people to curl up next to it.

This theory has been subject to serious and continued criticism by reputable disaster-relief professionals, but it remains popular online. “It pops up every time we have a large international earthquake,” says Emily White, director of preparedness for the Red Cross Bay Area. Trusted experts say the theory is false. “Its most egregious claim is that structures around the world will respond to an earthquake in the exact same way,” says White. In fact, not a single U.S. government agency or disaster-relief organization endorses Copp’s findings, and Copp himself is not affiliated with any certified agency or government entity.

The Triangle of Life presupposes that all buildings collapse in an earthquake, but that’s simply not true. In America, new buildings are constructed so that they can withstand seismic activity, and old buildings erected before we amassed our current body of knowledge of earthquakes are often retrofitted to provide extra protection. These building codes make a total collapse highly unlikely. For example, near the epicenter of the 1989 Loma Prieta quake in Northern California, which was about the same magnitude as the recent Haitian quake, only forty buildings collapsed—out of thousands—and none exhibited the kind of flattened “pancaking” Copp foretold.

In countries where the majority of buildings are made from brick, mud, or adobe, and where there is no uniform code for structural soundness, there will likely be more collapses and more loss of life. Copp formulated the Triangle of Life theory in Turkey, but even in that disaster, it was estimated that only 3 percent of buildings experienced partial collapses. Not only have critics slammed Copp for misleading the public by showing pictures of one building that collapsed amid thousands more that didn’t, but they have also questioned Copp’s credentials and credibility. Comparing disaster preparedness in the industrialized United States with disasters in Turkey, Haiti, or rural China is like comparing apples and oranges. “You can’t take a one-size-fits-all approach,” says White. “We don’t build things the same way.”

Watch Out for Falling Objects
Another thing that the Triangle of Life doesn’t mention is that the overwhelming majority of injuries during a quake don’t happen during a building collapse; they’re typically caused by falling debris and by people’s trying to move more than a few feet. “In an earthquake, the most important thing to do is to cover your head,” says White, “and the Triangle of Life can actually hurt more than harm because it leaves you exposed.” The Red Cross recommends getting underneath heavy objects to protect your head and neck, as with the Drop, Cover, and Hold On method. Earthquakes can shake loose light fixtures, tiles, or furniture, so getting underneath a desk or table is the best way to protect yourself.

9 readers liked this story.
From Around the Web:
12.28.2011
Gary Smith
deleted
This comment has been DELETED
02.14.2010
Hari
Drop Cover Hold is the thing to do! Copp has been seen to be a fake 'rescuer'. Please see http://www.abqjournal.com/terror/ Copp sued the author for slander in NY and the newspaper for libel in federal court in New Mexico. He lost both. He appealed the NY verdict and lost again.
02.12.2010
Rebecca Brown
I got this email forward, and have to admit, when I read it, I thought the idea made a lot of sense. But knowing that this method doesn't really work for places like San Francisco (where I live) also makes sense. I'm sticking with what the Red Cross and FEMA say to do and hope that I'll remain safe in the event of an earthquake.
We were taught "drop, cover, and hold on" but I panic so I will probably just run.
02.12.2010
Harriet M
I remember the old "duck and cover" drills from elementary school. I hope I remember it in the chaos of an earthquake!
It feels good to write.

Your stories, musings, and advice are welcome here. We know you've got something to share, so jump in!

Article_sweeps
Most Liked Stories
Loader_buff
Sweeps_offers_article_300_top
Win a $10,000 escape to Jamaica! Enter as often as you wish.
Win a $10,000 escape to Jamaica! Enter as often as you wish.
VIEW ALL