Can Animal Activism Go Too Far?

The president of the national animal rights group PETA is donating her remains when she dies, but not to science or sick people. Ingrid Newkirk has instructed that the “meat” of her body be barbecued, her skin made into leather products, her vacuum-packed liver be sent to France to protest foie gras, and an eye be delivered to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a “reminder that PETA will continue to be watching.”

Oh, and by the way, she would also like you to start calling fish “sea kittens.”

Newkirk’s grotesque will and her group’s loopy “sea kitten” campaign are signature PETA antics. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals doesn’t threaten researchers’ lives or condone bombing laboratories like more militant animal rights groups. But it does embrace an end-justifies-the-means approach, which has both attracted devoted followers and alienated many in the mainstream. In its nearly thirty-year history, PETA has garnered a reputation for its approach, which is one part porn—women with few or no clothes are a favorite PETA publicity stunt—and two parts shock value.

Because of—or in spite of—PETA’s strange strategies, the organization has made a large impact, spurring policy changes in many animal-testing laboratories and on livestock and poultry farms. Their investigations have resulted in criminal charges for workers who have abused animals, including one who skinned a pig alive. PETA has been a major force to change public opinion about the glamour of fur. But does their activism go too far, driving away would-be supporters and objectifying women in the name of animals?

Selling Animal Rights with Sex
To protest Canadian seal hunting, PETA held a demonstration with naked volunteers covered in fake blood “writhing” in the grass. The bloody bodies were supposed to represent slaughtered seals, but the image was far too evocative of violent porn.

Eva Mendes, Pamela Anderson, Kim Basinger, and Alicia Silverstone have all posed naked for PETA’s anti-fur “I’d Rather Go Nude” advertisements. 

In a campaign that reached cities across the United States, PETA volunteers clad in lingerie gave out bananas along with the message “Get a Rise out of Vegetarianism.” According to PETA, meat can cause impotence and infertility. Call me a cynic, but I find it hard to imagine that any man aroused by the women went to the PETA Web site and explored the reasons for becoming a vegetarian, let alone gave up meat. In another erotic PETA standby, yellow bikini-clad “chicks” crouch in wire cages illustrating the inhumane way chickens are often farmed. And to demonstrate the ethical dilemmas of eating pork, they have exhibited pregnant women in small pens on their hands and knees wearing nothing but panties.

6 readers liked this story.
share
POST
Way to go Joanne Chang! Very well said. I'm tired of hearing from others what they think I ought to do with my body or how I ought to feel about it. Sarah you say naked as if that's a bad thing....since when is nudity the same as porn? I feel that you are doing the same thing Peta is doing by beefing up propaganda when you say that. Peta is pushing some of us hardcore vegans away with their tactics no doubt, but nude is nature and as a beautiful woman if I choose to share that with the world that can only be seen as a positive thing. Although I don't agree with Peta, for instance they would like to ban all Pit Bulls which is like banning all Muslims from airports, but the insane over the top antics of the animal farming industry and the lame a$$ complacency of Americans to let it continue it is almost a big joke that it continues which requires a paradigm shift in consciousness for us before we see that we are all acting like big buffoons to continue to allow such torture.
I agree with PETA and the intense manner they use to get their point across. This country is bent on destroying anything or anyone that is unable to defend themselves/itselves. As that old adage goes, the fit of the fittest survives. I believe we all our on earth to do good work and for those that have no voice, need folks like PETA, Children Agencies, and other protective agencies to give cause like these a voice. Who cares if a woman shows her naked body? Get over it, already, this is the 21st Century! Why should people kill animals to wear as status symbols? This country is over the top with excess, materialism, and greed! I think it is great that PETA is a strong group! Rock on, PETA!
05.25.2009
EdenSprings
Can activism go too far? Well, let's rate which of these PETA-ideas are over the top: 1. Publish a comic book featuring a crazed housewife stabbing a blood-soaked rabbit on the cover with the title of "Your Mommy Kills Animals!" and distribute it to school kids. 2. Claim you are Pro Animal, but in 2008 report that of the 2,216 animals you took into your only shelter in Virginia, you euthanized (er...killed) 2,209 of them. 3. In April, Ingrid Newkirk handed out clubs to demonstrators to kill harp seals in Canada in order to save the cod (er...sea kittens). 4. Ingrid has publicly stated that she would rather save the life of a single lab rat than find a cure for cancer. 5. All of the above Find out what PETA's secret agendas are and how they're duping you by visiting this site: http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/o...
05.22.2009
Jean Richardson
You said ." People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals doesn’t threaten researchers’ lives or condone bombing laboratories like more militant animal rights groups" This is not true. PETA supports and defends the violent terroist groups. They have never denied this or denounced the violence. PETA is not a group for animal lovers. It is a group for human haters.
05.22.2009
Joanne Chang
Attacking women who willingly take off their clothes for a cause is a mesogenistic act. The reason I say that is because naked men (yes, men are used in stunts too. But they just get to have fun.) never have to justify why they are "exploiting" thier bodies. It's as if society readily accepts that men just owns thier bodies and they are free to do whatever they want with it. But when women do it, we are suddenly "objectifying" themselves and being 'exploited" by those who look at us. I agree with you that there's a deep prejudice in how society treats women and it has nothing to do with whether or not we use our bodies for a cause. It's extremely unfair that men get to go home after doing a naked stunt while women remain behind to be stoned by questions about why they have made decisions about their bodies without discussing it with the rest of the society first.
It feels good to write.

Your stories, musings, and advice are welcome here. We know you've got something to share, so jump in—maybe get a little famous. And don't worry—you can save a draft!

most liked
Loader_buff
Other topics you might appreciate
Relationships Play Career & Money Parenting