Feminism and a Pretty Bra

Listen people, before you read my blog post click on the link and read my friend Georgina’s blog post.
 
Did you read it? OK. Now you may read mine.
 
Georgina, the writer of the above blog, and a Facebook community of beautiful curvaceous women have opened my eyes to a very important subject. Bra sizes—and the fact that pretty much all women are not only wearing the wrong size, they are wearing a size two, three, four, or five cup sizes TOO SMALL and three or four band sizes TOO BIG! The problem seems to be even more rampant in the United States and Canada than it is in Europe (although it’s an issue there as well). I’m not going to talk about proper sizing and all that stuff because that is something that is very well covered by the awesome Georgina Horne in her blogs (seriously follow her blog fullerfigurefullerbust to learn all about the truth in bra sizing). Instead, what I want to talk about today is how this relates to my own version of feminism.
 
We’ve all been led to believe that women are supposed to fit into this A-DDD thirty-two to forty sizing chart. We have all been led to believe that if we are larger than a DDD we either have fake tits, or we are freaks of nature. We have also been led to believe that our band sizes are way bigger than they really are. Plus sized ladies like myself who wear a thirty-six (or even thirty-four) band size are thought to be lying the way a woman might lie about her weight. It’s not a lie. We just know how a bra is supposed to fit. When I say I am a 36J (which I am) I am not saying that I am not chubby—only “big boned.” I know damn well I’m chubby, thank you. What I’m saying is I wear a 36J! Freaking deal with it!
 
Oh yeah, I was going to talk about how this relates to feminism. Well, you know ... Women in our society (in most societies) have always gotten the message, either outright or subliminally, that we need to be SMALLER. Yes, even back in the forty’s and fifty’s when the ideal female body was a little bigger and curvier. We were still smaller. We receive the message that we need to be smaller in personality, smaller in opinions, speak more softly than men, smaller in stature, and basically just less THERE than men. And bra sizing has been no exception to this rule.
Women have been led to believe that if they are larger chested then they must be fat. For example, if I follow the bra- sizing guidelines for Playtex bras I’m a forty-two C, which is INSANE! I mean ... ANYONE who has ever seen me knows that THAT is insane!! But it’s like society can’t allow women to be both large AND feel good about our bodies. We’re not allowed to be large AND comfortable. If we are large, we must be punished for it. If a woman has breasts my size, well ... she must be a freak or really, REALLY fat or something. *sigh*.
So we are forced to smoosh our ample bosoms into way too small cups and pretend we are forty DDD’s. That’ll teach us, right?
 
Back in the 1960s women burned their bras. That didn’t work out too well because well, women kind of need bras, especially women my size. Ever seen a large breasted woman try to do jumping jacks or any sort of physical activity? Not a comfortable thing. But, that was the show of feminism in the 1960s (the second wave of feminism as it’s known). Bras, like their predecessor, the corset was a symbol of female bondage. From the 60s through the 80s second wave feminists burned bras, wore shoulder pads, and pushed their way through glass ceilings (and I am grateful that they did). They told the world that it might be a man’s world, but we can play that game too—and we can match up.
3 readers liked this story.
From Around the Web:
It feels good to write.

Your stories, musings, and advice are welcome here. We know you've got something to share, so jump in!

Article_sweeps
Most Liked Stories
Loader_buff
Sweeps_offers_article_300_top
Win a $10,000 escape to Jamaica! Enter as often as you wish.
Win a $10,000 escape to Jamaica! Enter as often as you wish.
VIEW ALL