Thirty Books Everyone Should Read Before They’re Thirty

Siddhartha-book-cover
Introduction | Start Slideshow

The web is grand. With its fame for hosting informative, easy-to-skim textual snippets and collaborative written works, people are spending more and more time reading online. Nevertheless, the web cannot replace the authoritative transmissions from certain classic books that have delivered (or will deliver) profound ideas around the globe for generations.

The thirty books listed here are of unparalleled prose, packed with wisdom capable of igniting a new understanding of the world. Everyone should read these books before their thirtieth birthday.

Button_startslideshow
13 readers liked this story.
email
Plus_14MORE WAYS TO SHARE
01.17.2012
Susie Quest
I would also recommend John Steinbeck - Tortilla Flat. Whether a persons life is faith based or not I would recommend an examination of the Proverbs and the gospels of Matthew, Mark Luke and John.
01.14.2012
Pelle Snow
Why so few female authors on the list? I counted Harper Lee & that's about it. If I missed someone...it was probably some ONE. No Jane Austen? Considering she wrote about the limited roles of women in society - still applicable today - would think she'd be a natural inclusion. Ditto Edith Wharton. No Anne Frank? How could you leave that off the list? Where's Sylvia Plath, Patricia Hightower, Shirley Jackson? The Bronte sisters? And a great children's book about girls, "Little Women." You may argue that a lot of these books won't appeal to males - that's exactly why they should read them! Because they give insight into women's experiences...which I at least feel are important.
09.08.2010
Andrew Burt
It's a nice list, but in 30 (or any small N) it's hard to get every good book in there. For those who want more depth or want to vote for their favorites, see a crowdsourced effort at http://www.critters.org/bestpoll
08.05.2010
Mark Dozier
I'm sure someone already said it, but "Brave New World" isn't on your list, and seriously, it's way way better than "1984." Think about it, "1984" describes a world where they give us no information, but BNW pictures a world where there is so much information overload that news and gossip become one and important stories get lost and watered down. In 1984 everyone lives in a paranoid, captive society. In BNW the society is trivial, irrelevant, bent on pleasure seeking, thrills. Orwell feared that what we hate and despise ie dictatorship, tyranny, and oppression will rule our lives. He was wrong. This is the exception. Huxley predicted that which we love will destroy us eg sports, sex, TV, video games. So which of these is the more accurate representation of the "future" that we live in today? Oh, and I read "Anna Karinina" and it was one of the worst books I've ever read. Not a chance I'll ever pick up "War and Peace." "Crime and Punishment" on the other hand was incredible.
08.04.2010
Joseph Moore
I don't know why The Origin of Species is on there! God is the only way, and the only social contract is to worship Him while never questioning big business, the fractional reserve system, or Senators! Rock n' Roll, God Bless America.
It feels good to write.

Your stories, musings, and advice are welcome here. We know you've got something to share, so jump in!

Article_sweeps
most liked
Loader_buff
Sweeps_offers_article_300_top
How Do You Avoid Calorie Overload? Chime in and win $500!
How Do You Avoid Calorie Overload? Chime in and win $500!
Slimming down for a big event? Tell us about it and win $500!
Slimming down for a big event? Tell us about it and win $500!
VIEW ALL
Other topics you might appreciate