Dog Spelled Forwards Is “Dog”

By: Sarah Gold (View Profile)

This is just one of many pronouncements that Blue makes throughout the book, and Velner (who is identified as an attorney in his author bio—mind-altering drugs are not mentioned) records them as though he is simply taking dictation. The envelope is pushed even further in Llyn de Danaan’s Koans for the Inner Dog: A Guide to Canine Enlightenment. Here, the doggy declarations have formal attributions:

  • It is never true that the bark is worse than the bite. A bite is always worse and is spiritually dangerous for the biter. —Foxy, Akita poet and painter
Believe it or not, I think projecting such nonsense onto dogs is worse than laughable. I think it can actually be harmful (at least, to dogs). After all, how can we hope to train dogs properly—to teach them to avoid oncoming cars, and refrain from biting passing strangers—if we’ve decided they’re our spiritual superiors? Regardless of what innate wisdom they do or don’t possess, dogs that are able to peacefully coexist (and just plain exist) in our anthropocentric world do so by following certain rules. Since it’s up to us to teach them those rules, we need to remember who’s in charge.

At the end of the day, I suppose that as long as people do their best to raise happy, healthy dogs, it’s none of my business what they believe. But I stop myself from wondering about Herbert Brokering, whose book Dog Psalms: Prayers My Dogs Have Taught Me interprets canines thusly:

  • I am dog…the tides of the oceans are in me. I wiggle as I ride waves, hear love calls of ancient forests, feel the kiss of a wisp of wind. I have a spirit that runs through all times.
But what I really want to know is, do his dogs come when they’re called?
2 readers liked this story.
share
bookmarks
Comments
posted: 01.07.2008
Veronica Kavanagh
I totally agree with you. I am a dog (and cat) lover but to ascribe all this higher spiritual plane stuff to them is, I think, an insult to their basic nature. Why can't we love them for just what they are, nothing else, just as they love us for what we are? Plus, an undisciplined animal is likely to end up in trouble with other people, so we owe it to them to provide loving training.
posted: 01.07.2008
Veronica Kavanagh
I totally agree with you. I am a dog (and cat) lover but to ascribe all this higher spiritual plane stuff to them is, I think, an insult to their basic nature. Why can't we love them for just what they are, nothing else, just as they love us for what we are? Plus, an undisciplined animal is likely to end up in trouble with other people, so we owe it to them to provide loving training.
posted: 03.02.2007
Kathleen Terrance
This is hilarious. I actually loved Marley and Me and see my dog in Marley as I am sure many do. That being said, my dog is as enlightened as my gold fish. He's a great dog and companion and he provides me and endless source of amusement, irritation, love and companionship but none of that involves any "thought" on his part (well maybe the irritation).
Tell us a Story.

You know you've got something to share. Maybe it's something funny, touching, inspirational or informative. Whatever it is, your circle of friends here at DivineCaroline would love to hear from you.

Btn_articletour
most liked
Loader_buff
Other topics you might appreciate
Play Career & Money Parenting