Revisiting Birthing in America

By: Raakhi Mohan (View Profile)

She has to carry the anxiety of analyzing when she should go back to the hospital, and then has to be transported when her contractions are peaking. Once that she has sufficiently progressed to be admitted, she will be poked and prodded and asked to sign administrative paperwork; this is the last thing anyone in great discomfort wishes to go through.

Women, especially first time mothers, become fearful of their ability to make it through the rest of labor when they dont have adequate support in the first phase (begins with onset of contractions and ends with crowning). These feelings of fear and loss of control manifest as tension in her body, causing the woman in labor to have more pain and more fear—a self perpetuating cycle.

In addition, the baby feels every bit of that negative energy. In fact the baby feels everything the mother does; if the mother is calm and unafraid, the newborn will also be at more peace. As I learned from my sisters prenatal hypno-birthing classes, hypno-babies are reputed for being most calm newborns; they actually cry less and smile more. From an Ayurvedic perspective, this makes complete sense.

In ayurveda, and all holistic healing modalities, we acknowledge that we internalize the energy around us. Since everything in the universe reduces to energy, every happening in the universe is a transfer of energy. In any given situation, we are taking in the energy of what we hear, see, smell, feel, and eat. During labor, of course, the woman is a conduit, focusing all of the energy she is surrounded with on birthing. This underscores the importance of all the different forms of energy present at a birthing. Lighting, aromas, noises, people, props all affect the mothers experience and, in turn, the babys.

It is no surprise, given current hospital standards, that most women in the hospital setting opt for epidural pain control—they are terrified. Sadly, anesthesia increases the risk of labor complications for both the mother and baby. In addition, the sensory loss makes it virtually impossible for the woman to use the perineal and birth canal muscles to actively and safely push the baby through the birth canal. Instead of this being the most beautiful moment of a womans life, we remove her from the experience. Ive spoken to many mothers who can barely remember the first moments with the baby (before it is whisked away to the neonatal unit) because they were too drugged. Again, there are women that would prefer anesthesia, however, hospitals could easily support a woman desiring natural birth instead of encouraging medication. In addition, women should be provided with the risks and benefits of anesthesia well before labor, so they can make informed decisions.

9 readers liked this story.
share
bookmarks
Comments
posted: 01.18.2008
Sandi E
I agree with this article. I can't wait for a birthing revolution. I dilivered my first in a Hospital. I did not know my rights, and I fell into the hospital routeen. It was a horrible experience! So bad that with my second child fear kept me from going to the hospital, and I dilivered at home unnasisted. My third I had a wonderful Midwife attended home birth. I am now pregnant with my fourth and look forward to birthing at home! I think that our society places so much fear into women about the birth experience. They go to the hospital with a false sence of saftey, and end up missing out on one of the most incredible experiences of their lives.
posted: 01.15.2008
Betty Lou
I really enjoyed your story. I am now expecting my third child. My first I pretty much knew nothing. I had an ob, was induced, had an epidural that did more harm than help, and ended with an emergency cesarean. It was the scariest thing that ever happened to me. I had no idea that everything my doctor suggested raised my risk for cesarean. Not to mention my fear was only holding the babe in. My second child was also a hospital delivery but with a midwife. This was a completely different experience. I was so fortunate to have a very quick delivery so the hospitals standards did not have time to effect us. The quick labor and the short stay was just long enough for me to get a staph infection. I had to have surgery when my daughter was a month old. Thank God she was unaffected and I am fine. Now, with my third child, I want to deliver at home. I will be using the same midwives, they were wonderful! I only wish I knew all this the first time!
posted: 12.23.2007
Lorelyn
Raakhi, you are 100% right in your analysis and conclusions regarding hospital vs. home birth in America, and the auras and energies surrounding each one. I have delivered all three of my babies at home, but because of postpartum hemmorhage with the last delivery, I was rushed to a hospital to receive a blood transfusion and postpartum care. Although my experience was all in all better than many women's that I have heard, I was still disgusted by the lack of attention to my personal opinions and requests, and the ER doctor on duty actually had the gall to say, while standing at the foot of my bed immediately after I had been admitted, "I don't have time for this." (Meaning me.) The general atmosphere in the hospital was cold, rude, uncaring, and machinated, as opposed to the positive, calm, intimate atmosphere at home. Every mother I know has horror stories of the treatment she received while giving birth to a new life in a hospital. There is, without question, a need for change.
It feels good to write.

Your stories, musings, and advice are welcome here. We know you've got something to share, so jump in—maybe get a little famous. And don't worry—you can save a draft!

most liked
Loader_buff
Other topics you might appreciate
Relationships Body & Soul Style