Do Boys and Girls Learn Differently?

By: Rick Ackerly (View Profile)

In that last sentence I deliberately sounded unscientific. My reason? The science of teaching is increasingly being driven by scientific discoveries in other fields, when it should merely be informed by them. The science of education is the science of leading each child’s genius out in the world to function effectively in it. At its core is the concept that each child is unique and that good teaching teaches as if each child is unique.

So in the early years, there need to be centers around the room that are so carefully designed that children want to work in them and in this process, direct themselves into the complexities of language and mathematics, as well as art, physics, and biology. Group activities need to have many ways of different students to “strut their stuff,” and not always make some kids look like the good ones and the rest feel less.

The great teachers I have known have always maintained that “children teach themselves to read.” These are the words of my current first grade teacher—when she taught kindergarten, her students would almost always go on to first grade reading. She was very sophisticated in her teaching so that students taught themselves to read. All good teachers do that—they create the conditions in which children will, on their own time table and in their own way, learn all that needs to be learned. That is what we need, and it is gender-neutral.

The differences between girls and boys is widely known. Let’s not forget that it is so true that it has been cliché for at least a hundred years that schooling is not for boys—schooling done traditionally, that is. It was Mark Twain who said: “I never let schooling interfere with my education.

Related Story: What’s up with Boys?

From the Principal’s Office: Lessons on Learning, Life, and Parenting is published bi-monthly. Each column is written by Rick Ackerly, a distinguished educator with thirty years experience in middle and elementary school education, who is currently the Head of the Children’s Day School in San Francisco.

Never miss a column again. Just click on the author’s name at the top of the story, then select “Be notified when writer publishes” at the top of the page. We’ll send you an email as soon as a new column is published.

4 readers liked this story.
share
bookmarks
Comments
posted: 01.01.2008
Peter Ackerly
This was the big take-away for me: "The science of teaching is increasingly being driven by scientific discoveries in other fields when it should merely be informed by them." The best teachers I know are able to use the research and their technical training in a way that augments an approach that is first and foremost about deep knowledge of the particular child. More than once I have had the experience of someone tsk-tsk-ing me for trying out reading material with my son (age 6) that is not "age-appropriate." But I can't think of any better way to serve him. We are all familiar with the phenomenon of high-energy (often but not always male) kids being badly served by sit-down-and-shut-up education, but just because more mild-mannered (often but not always female) kids are able to color inside the lines does not mean that we are serving the “female” population any better. What’s that thing about sales? If you’re closing the sale 100% of the time, you’re failing.
Tell us a Story.

You know you've got something to share. Maybe it's something funny, touching, inspirational or informative. Whatever it is, your circle of friends here at DivineCaroline would love to hear from you.

most liked
Loader_buff
Other topics you might appreciate
Relationships Travel Home & Food Neighborhood & World