Michael Moore’s Latest: Sicko

By: Brie Cadman (View Profile)

When I went to see Michael Moore’s new documentary, Sicko, I had a pretty good idea of what to expect. The Academy Award winning director of Bowling for Columbine and Fahrenheit 9/11 is not known for making films with a balanced perspective: he is often described as polemical, polarizing, and—by those on the receiving end of his criticisms—biased.

Although Sicko, which lambastes the United States health care system, could be called all of these things, it does raise some issues that few Americans will dispute. Health care in our country is generally considered too expensive (a recent poll by USA Today found that 79 percent of people queried were dissatisfied with health care costs) and health care reform is on most presidential candidate agendas. The controversy surrounding his movie, then, is not in the problem, it is in the solution.

The movie opens with the gruesome image of a man sewing up his own knee, and the disheartening account of an uninsured man who, after cutting off the tops of two fingers with a table saw, has to choose between saving the ring finger for $12,000 or the middle finger for $60,000 (he picks the ring). The movie, however, is not about the forty-four million uninsured Americans. The movie is about those of us who are insured, but still have a hefty price to pay—one that often puts our health in jeopardy.

One of those people is a seventy-nine year old sprightly man who, despite his age, continues to do janitorial work at a grocery chain in order to keep his and his wife’s health care benefits. He quips, “If there are golden years, I can’t find them,” while cleaning out toilets, hauling trash, and wiping up spills in the freezer section.

But his plight seems almost justified in contrast to Moore’s other exemplars of an unfair insurance system. A young woman is denied coverage of an ambulance ride after being in a car accident, her insurance company stating she should have obtained prior authorization. A twenty-two year-old woman is diagnosed with cervical cancer, but her company won’t pay for treatment; they claim she is too young to get cancer. A man whose young daughter is born with a hearing defect fights the insurance company who denied one cochlear ear implant but not the other, claiming it was experimental. He is baffled as to why one implant is standard medicine but another is not. He eventually gets both, only after alerting his insurance company that Michael Moore was including him in his film.

1 reader liked this story.
bookmarks
Comments
posted: 11.13.2007
Kristi Crocker
I was turned on to this movie shortly after my dad who was batteling cancer was in turmoil with his insurance company, Anthem. They wouldnt allow him to see the necessary physicians to treat his very rare cancer. They kept denying his appeals and before long, the cancer was in his brain and he became terminal. I have no doubt in my mind that my father would be here today if he had recieved the proper treatments he thought he was paying his health insurance provider for. I applaud Michael Moore for giving victims like my father a voice and shining a light on an issue greater than we even know. I too had blinders on thinking we had such a great health care system. But we dont....we are just dollar signs to health insurance and pharmecutical companies. They arent in business to help us get better, they are here to get rich. Can you imagine watching a loved one dye infront of you for the sake of someone getting richer? Let me tell you its infuriating!
posted: 08.22.2007
Emily Kronenberger
I am sometimes conflicted by specific elements within Michael Moore's portrayal of issues in this country. However, I am in general a huge fun simply for the fact that he is one of the only popular film makers that can get real mainstream dialogue going about things like racism, gun violence, government corruption, and now, the U.S. healthcare system. I saw "Sicko" during its debut weekend in an almost-empty theater in New Jersey, and I was impressed by the take home message which is that we as U.S. citizens are all vulnerable to health crisis, and financial crisis as a result. In addition, I think that a critical point needs to be made about "socialized" medicine. Usually, the criticism behind a government run healthcare system from politicians is that we will have no choices when it comes to making decisions about healthcare providers, etc. Yet, I marvel about how currently, managed care does not provide consumers with any more choices than a "socialized" system would afford us.
posted: 07.17.2007
Jordan Tiffany
When I stepped into the theatre to see this film, I was pretty skeptical... When I walked out, I had some mixed emotions. On one hand I was impressed with Moore himself, for the most part. What I have felt he's done wrong in the past is get in front of the camera too much... In this film I feel like he did a good job of telling the stories without having to stand there and tell them. I was saddened by his take on our current state. I'm going to be honest and say that I was completely ignorant about health insurance. As a 20 year old college student, my parents have total control over my insurance, and the only time I had anything to do with it, I was in the hospital for kidney stones(not a fun time). So he really opened my eyes. I highly recommend this movie!
posted: 07.16.2007
Stef Ordoveza
Although Michael Moore can be a bit biased, I do agree that without his work, much of what ails our society today would not receive the attention it so desperately needs. I think more people need to understand that by simply ignoring these problems, more and more institutions (not just health-related ones) are getting away with exploiting people for the sake of money. Moore's question is valid, "Who are we?" Who are we on both sides? Who are we to think we can take advantage of people for the sake of getting richer? And who are we to ignore what is happening and not do anything to change it? Thank you for your review!!
posted: 07.14.2007
Nancy Puckett
Wow! Michael Moore has really opened a can of worms (hours of discussion on CNN etc.) and he can't be faulted for that. It really worries me that it is recommended that when one retires 200,000 to 300,000 dollars should be in reserve for medical costs not covered by medicare or other insurance. This is impossible for most retirees and keeps old folks up at night.
It feels good to write.

Your stories, musings, and advice are welcome here. We know you've got something to share, so jump in—maybe get a little famous. And don't worry—you can save a draft!

most liked
Loader_buff
Other topics you might appreciate
Relationships Career & Money Neighborhood & World Parenting