Nav_gr_channelNav_gr_homeNav_gr_home_overNav_gr_subchannel

Sing Yourself Lean

By: Scott Saifer (View Profile)

If you’re like many of the women athletes I’ve coached in the past, you’ve probably spent time gathering information on the use of aerobic exercise as part of a weight maintenance plan. You may have come across two contradictory suggestions for how hard you should exercise. One approach argues that the harder you exercise, the more total calories you expend in the time spent exercising—so the harder you exercise, the faster you’ll lose weight.

On the other side we have an approach focusing on the “fat burning zone.” This approach recognizes that the lower the intensity of effort, the higher the proportion of the expended calories coming from fat. In this sense, easy walking might be the ultimate exercise, because in everyone but the totally unfit, easy walking maximizes fat expenditure as a fraction of total calories expended. Fat calories are the ones that matter as you reduce your body fat, get a trim figure, or lose weight. Easy walking doesn’t use many calories though…

So what’s the answer? Easy exercise or hard? As with so much in life, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. Even ignoring the fact that if you exercise too hard you’ll be worn out and quit sooner, the harder you exercise, the greater the proportion of your expended calories coming from carbohydrate. In fact, if you exercise at or above your upper ventilatory threshold (the speed or heart rate at which you begin to breath hard enough that chatting is no longer possible) you use virtually no fat at all, but almost exclusively carbohydrate. Now, you can’t exercise hard unless you have full or nearly full carbohydrate stores, so between hard workouts you have to replace any carbohydrate calories expended, or you won’t be able to exercise hard again. This means that exercise near the upper ventilatory threshold is virtually useless in a weight control plan.

Exercise near the upper ventilatory threshold is actually worse than useless in many cases. If you exercise long enough and hard enough to deplete glycogen stores, your blood sugar levels drop and you get hungry. Unfortunately appetite is not so finely tuned that it shuts off when you have consumed exactly the number of calories that are needed to replace carbohydrate used during exercise. Most people, if they do not willfully restrain themselves, will eat more than is directly needed for replenishment, a few minutes to hours after a very hard workout. This is true even for people who lose their appetite after hard exercise; they just take a little longer to overeat. In addition, the harder the exercise, the more willpower required for willful restraint. By stimulating appetite, hard workouts make it harder, rather than easier, to lose weight.
2 readers liked this story.
share
bookmarks
Comments
posted: 08.15.2007
Stef Ordoveza
Hmm..this is interesting! I will definitely try this out and let you know if I see any results!
posted: 02.23.2007
Kathleen Terrance
This is so true. I've been running since I was in high school but a few years ago I wanted to try a marathon. I read a book that had me slow way down to the point where I could talk while running. While I wasn't specifically looking to lose weight, all of a sudden I did (10 lbs!). I hadn't changed the amount of exercise at all, I just starting running slower.
Tell us a Story.

You know you've got something to share. Maybe it's something funny, touching, inspirational or informative. Whatever it is, your circle of friends here at DivineCaroline would love to hear from you.

Btn_articletour
most liked
Loader_buff
Other topics you might appreciate
Relationships Body & Soul Style Home & Food