Power-to-Weight: Cycling and Body Image in a World Where Skinny Rules

By: Katie Lambden (View Profile)

Cycling, as far as I know, is the only community in which men appear to obsess more over their weight than women do. The first time I heard a male member of the spandex set complaining how big his butt was this season, I almost laughed, thinking he had to be joking. Thank goodness I didn’t, since he was totally, unhappily, serious.

There are all kinds of body types in men’s professional cycling, but it’s true that most of them are on the skinny side. There’s tall and twiggy (your all-arounders and classics riders), and short and twiggy (your climbers and stage racers, mostly). Even the sprinters, who look stocky compared to the rest of the riders, are shockingly thin in reality. I recently met Mario Cipollini, a decorated sprinter who always looked enormous and lion-like on video compared to his teammates; in person he is tall (six feet and three inches) but incredibly narrow-shouldered and lanky; in his prime, he was only 167 pounds!

Essentially, long hours of training burn so many calories that body fat drops to under maybe 5 percent. Extra weight, at any event, only holds a cyclist back when the road goes uphill. The magic mantra is the power-to-weight ratio: the more power you can produce, and the less you weigh, the faster you will climb. Of course this is only true to a certain extent: lose too much body mass, and you will rapidly lose power too, resulting in a lower power-to-weight  ratio. However, I’m not really here to discuss the scientific physiological arguments for or against weight control in endurance sports: I’m interested in the psychological aspects.

Unexpected as this may seem, my impression is that there is actually greater variety in body types among pro women racers. Perhaps this is because the formula relating power to weight is actually subtly different for women than it is for men. There are lots of thin girls, of course (both tall and petite), but there are also girls with lots of muscle and girls with curves (though, truthfully, not too many: flat-chestedness appear to be almost a prerequisite for lining up at a national-level race).

At any rate, I hear much less commentary from women bike racers about their shape and size than I do from men. All the same, I’m not sure this is because women are less concerned about weight. Perhaps we’re just more private about our anxieties.

1 reader liked this story.
bookmarks
Comments
posted: 03.09.2008
Andrew J. Bernstein
Great story Katie, but I think you're putting too much importance on power-to-weight ratios. I'm a cyclist who obsesses over my diet and weight, but don't know anything about power, and don't care about calculating ratios... I just want to look like my heroes, both those locally and on the national and international levels! Men can have body-image issues too, and some of us don't need to base our issues in metrics...
posted: 09.13.2007
Brie Cadman
I've definitely heard the "I need to lose weight to be faster" sentiment among some of my male running friends. I think any sport where leanness lends a competitive advantage, it will be an issue. I run because I like to, but also because it keeps me in shape...and allows me to eat cookies.
posted: 06.10.2007
Akinder Gill
You brought up and examined some very interesting points that haven't really been talked about before. Maybe male and female cyclists choose to dialogue about different insecurities.
posted: 05.30.2007
Piggie P
Oh, so true, so true. I appologize whole heartedly for my awe induced, thoughtless comments on your physique and physical prowless...You are, and ever will be and inspiration and role model that I can only hope to emulate in some small way. xoxo
It feels good to write.

Your stories, musings, and advice are welcome here. We know you've got something to share, so jump in—maybe get a little famous. And don't worry—you can save a draft!

most liked
Loader_buff
Other topics you might appreciate
Relationships Travel Style Career & Money