The Voter’s View: Why Don’t We Count?

By: Stephen W. Simpson, Ph.D. (View Profile)

Though the Electoral College is antiquated, at least it’s constitutional and based on the model of a Republic. Superdelegates, however, represent a kind of oligarchy where the privileged few get to decide what’s best for the rest of us. The people who elected them to public office did not knowingly empower them to decide who gets to run for president. Superdelegates vote according to their own judgment instead of the will of the people.

If Hillary Clinton wins the nomination based on superdelegates alone, she just might lose the general election to John McCain. If the Democratic Party nominates the candidate with the least elected delegates, it should expect nothing less than apathy and dismay from voters. If the self-proclaimed party of the people does not honor the will of the people, then what’s the point of voting for a Democrat? When citizens cannot have a government for the people, by the people, some become cynical and vote for whoever is going to lower their taxes.

The rules of this particular game have been set and we must honor the outcome. I am not trying to start a revolution (though if the Michigan and Florida delegates get seated without a re-vote, you might find me atop a barricade in Denver this summer). After this election, however, the DNC needs to eliminate superdelegates from the nominating process. In the meantime, we can write letters and emails to the superdelegates, urging them to vote according to the will of the people. More than ever, every vote needs to count.

Related Story: Poll: The Influence of Super Delegates

9 readers liked this story.
bookmarks
Comments
posted: 04.18.2008
Jennifer Hastings
There are many organizations out there advocating for election reform like Common Cause and reformelections.org, representing all sides, democrat, libertarian, republican etc. Nothing is set in stone. I’ve learned from such sites that the U.S. Constitution allows each state to choose its own system for picking electors, and over our history states have used a variety of methods for doing so. So technically, by acting together, states can choose to elect the president who wins the national popular vote. The electoral catastrophe in the 2000 presidential election is a pretty strong indicator that the system needs to change. Congress, the states, and the media start need to pay more attention to this critical issue since voter confidence (which seems low to me) is essential to free and fair elections.
posted: 04.05.2008
Solitaire Barragan
In a civilized society, you have to abide by the rules. They were set some time ago and they were decided by a majority. There are several reasons why they are the way they are. And you can not change the rules the very moment you want them to change... just because you don't like them! In the end, what really matters is: who can win the general election. The way this primaries take place (some times opened to general electorate), includes the concept of super-delegates. You can't change horses in the middle of the river. You got to go, the same way it goes. I encourage you to push for a change in the primary's rules... for the next primaries! Not this time. Please. No, no, no! Unless you want the same kind of goverment that has taken away your fundamental liberties... In this land of the free.
posted: 04.03.2008
Cindy Wood
Here! Here! My sentiments, exactly. As a log cabin conservative who has found herself admiring a statesman like Obama and who has many friends who will align themselves with him but not with a "good old boy" woman who has gathered super-delegates, we can only pray! I hope other leaders, like my state's Bill Richardson,. who has endorsed Obama much to the fury of the Clintons, will let their moral sense guide them.
posted: 04.02.2008
Sherrolyn Mincey
I live in Florida and we have been told we cannot vote and have a say in who is elected on the Democratic platform because of some stupid rule that says we held primaries too early. That is ridiculous. I am an adult and regardless of who I plan to vote for (Democratic or Republican) the Democratic party telling Florida and Michigan their votes don't count is the same as telling our states they are of no value.
posted: 04.01.2008
Ellie Boylan
I totally agree but feel powerless. I can send a message to superdelegates but why will they listen to me? They've got Bill Clinton begging to take them to lunch. How can we band together and demand change? Tell me of an organization that can do this and I'll join in......
It feels good to write.

Your stories, musings, and advice are welcome here. We know you've got something to share, so jump in—maybe get a little famous. And don't worry—you can save a draft!

most liked
Loader_buff
Other topics you might appreciate
Neighborhood & World